Traditional Chinese — also called “Regular Chinese” or “kǎishū”, appeared around 200 BC. There were numerous evolutionary stages between Small Seal and Traditional Chinese, including a looser, more calligraphic style called “Clerical Script”. At this stage, some of the stylistic conventions appeared that still exist today: thickness at the end of a stroke, and thickening of strokes that go down.
This was further refined in the Song and Ming dynasties (960 through 1644, with an interruption for the Mongols), when wood-block printing was popular. It is easier to carve straight lines parallel to the grain than perpendicular to the grain, and thin cuts against the grain would break. This led the carvers to make the characters with thin horizontal lines and thick vertical lines.
Just as the shape of cuneiform glyphs was influenced by the writing technology, so was Chinese. Writing material affecting glyph shape is something you will see over and over again as I go through more writing systems.
In Traditional Chinese now, there are only eight basic stroke shapes, all of which appear in the symbol for “eternity”:
This, coupled with Chinese’s open-ended character set, means that it is possible to make up nonsense characters that look plausible. An artist named Xu Bing did just that, with a massive work that followed conventions for artistic scrolls, but which had nonsense glyphs on it. Apparently this was profoundly disturbing to many Chinese people. To be able to read was an important part of their self-identity as an educated person. Being able to read standard written Chinese has — for hundreds of years — been a unifying element of Chinese culture with its many spoken languages, so reading Chinese was also an important part of those Chinese people’s cultural identity.
Those of us who can only read Latin-script languages probably cannot fully appreciate this dissonance, given as how we are used to seeing Latin-script text that we cannot understand. (I don’t know if there is even one person in the world who reads ALL of the languages written with Latin script — English AND Finnish AND Basque AND Maori…)
Pingback: Khitan scripts — 920 AD and 925 AD, Mongolia | Glyph of the Day
Pingback: Jurchen Scripts — 1119 AD and 1138 AD, Northeast China | Glyph of the Day
Pingback: Manyogana — 450 AD, Japan | Glyph of the Day
Pingback: Hiragana — ~800 AD, Japan | Glyph of the Day
Pingback: Kanji — 600? AD, Japan | Glyph of the Day
Pingback: Idu — 650? AD, Korea | Glyph of the Day
Pingback: Hyangchal — 600? AD, Korea | Glyph of the Day
Pingback: Gugyeol — 950? AD, Korea | Glyph of the Day
Pingback: Hangul — 1446 AD, Korea | Glyph of the Day
Pingback: Zetian characters — 690 AD, China | Glyph of the Day
Pingback: Gaiji | Glyph of the Day
Pingback: Taiwanese kana — ~1900 AD, Taiwan | Glyph of the Day
Pingback: Tangut — 1036, China | Glyph of the Day
Pingback: Siddham — 650 AD, India | Glyph of the Day
Pingback: Simplified Chinese — 1956 AD, China | Glyph of the Day
Pingback: Grantha — 500 AD, India | Glyph of the Day
Pingback: Nushu — 1300 AD?, China | Glyph of the Day