Administration: pub time, comments

Two administrative things:

#1: I have changed the time I schedule posts to automatically publish from 00:01 to 20:30.  I discovered that I was trying to wait up until the pub time in order to announce the publication on Facebook, and I really need to go to bed before 00:01.

#2: I changed it so that you have to register to comment.  I was getting on the order of 20-30 link spams per day, comments that said something like “Thanks for that awesome posting.  It saved MUCH time!” with a link to sites peddling cheap drugs, nurse certification, botox, or metal detectors.  Sorry, but I got tired of it.

Posted in Administration | 1 Comment

Samaritan — ~600 BC, Israel

Samaritan "y"

There is a joke among linguists about the difference between a dialect and a language: “a language is a dialect with a standing army”.
Similarly, I think that the distinction between the first alphabet used to write Hebrew — what is commonly called “Old Hebrew script” — and Phoenician script is more a description of a cultural difference than a functional difference.  To my eye, Old Hebrew script looks more like Phoenician script than some of the different dialects of what is happily called Phoenician script.

The Samaritans, like the other tribes of Israel, started out using the Phoenician/Old Hebrew alphabet.  Most of the tribes of Israel eventually switched over to using the Aramaic alphabet, but the Samaritans kept using the Phoenician/Old Hebrew alphabet.  Over time, its glyphs evolved into a distinct variant.  Note that there is still a one-to-one correspondence between Phoenician/Old Hebrew and Samaritan, so Samaritan has more of a font difference with Phoenician than a fundamental difference in the writing system mechanics.

The alert reader will notice that I used the present tense in the last sentence: there are still about 700 speakers of Samaritan in Israel and the West Bank.  The glyph at the top is the modern version of the “yodh” character.

Links: Wikipedia, Ancient Scripts, Omniglot

Posted in Abjad, Rating: 4 "Huh, interesting!" | Leave a comment

Venetic — 690 BC, Italy

Venetic "a"

Venetic was an Indo-European language related to Latin, spoken on the Italian peninsula in the vicinity of what became Venice.  Venetic was one of several scripts in what is now Italy, representing quite a few languages: Latin, Etruscan, Venetic, Faliscan in a small area smack in the middle,Umbrian in the central part of Italy, South Picene on the central Adriatic, Oscan in southern Italy, Nuceria in southern Italy, Lugano in northern Italy/southern Switzerland, Raetic in northeastern Italy, and Camunic in northwestern Italy.  The scripts were very similar, but not identical, and derived from a western dialect of the Greek script, occasionally going through Etruscan first.

While Venetic did not use interword separator marks, Oscan used interpuncts to separate words and Umbrian used double dots (“:”).  Some languages were written right-to-left, some left-to-right, some boustrophedonically.  It seems like they didn’t care all that much which direction to go.

How could so many writing systems exist in such a small (to Canadians) place?  Two factors: the population density was much lower and most people didn’t travel much.  Traders went all over, colonizers went all over, soldiers went all over, but ordinary folks didn’t go very far.  Not only were ordinary folks limited to walking speed, but they also were limited by how much food they could bring with them (no grocery stores along the way!), and — with limited literacy and expensive or heavy writing materials — no maps and no guidebooks.  If you wanted to travel, you needed to go with someone who knew the way.

All of the Italic scripts we know of (not just Etruscan and Latin and Venetic) started being written around 600-400 BC.  Venetic and all the other non-Latin scripts died out under the Roman cultural dominance by around 100-200 AD.

Links: Ancient Scripts, Adolfo Zavronim (in Italian), Wikipedia

Posted in Alphabet, Rating: 4 "Huh, interesting!" | Leave a comment

Old Persian cuneiform — 525 BC?, Iran

Old Persian word divider

The earliest Old Persian cuneiform we know of is in a stupid-huge trilingual inscription in Old Persian, Elamite cuneiform, and Babylonian cuneiform (basically well-aged Akkadian cuneiform).  The inscription, at Behistun, Iran, is 15m by 25m, 100m up the side of a cliff face, and is basically Darius the Great bragging about how he totally kicked butt in various conflicts.  Because it was so large and so inaccessible, the writing lasted quite well long enough to be deciphered.  Stupid tank soldiers used it for stupid target practice in stupid WWII, and stupid damaged it.  Fortunately, the damage was relatively mild, and happened after Old Persian had been deciphered.

Georg Friedrich Grotefend, building on the works of a few others, made some insightful observations/guesses in about 1835 that allowed the Old Persian writing system to start being deciphered, something that three others finished shortly afterward.  It helped that Old Persian script was sort of an alphabet (with slanted wedge word dividers!) and that the language was relatively close to the well-known modern Persian.

Without the Behistun inscription, Old Persian cuneiform would not have been cracked so soon.  Without Old Persian cuneiform, Elamite cuneiform would not have been cracked so soon or possibly at all, and Babylonian/Akkadian cuneiform would have been a lot harder.

Old Persian is not related to any of the other cuneiforms, nor obviously to any other language.  Darius the Great claimed to have invented it, but he might have been exaggerating.

It is a somewhat unusual writing system to classify.  It has syllables, and some of the syllables have an implied vowel.  However, Old Persian also has vowels; the vowel can be added to a syllable to denote a lengthened vowel or a diphthong.  Thirteen of the characters are for invariant consonants, i.e. do not change regardless of what comes after it.  Finally, there are eight optional logograms.  Thus it has aspects of an alphabet, a syllabary, and even of a logographic writing system.

Note that Old Persian, Babylonian, and Elamite cuneiform were still being used, 300ish years after the Latin script showed up, and 400ish years after Greek showed up.  Cuneiform was a remarkably long-lived writing technology!  Clay was cheap, paper had not been invented yet, papyrus only grew in Egypt, and cloth and leather were expensive.

Because so much was written on clay in antiquity, in antiquity history was frequently written by the losers.  Cuneiform tablets were usually not fired on purpose, and so didn’t last.  Many of the clay tablets which survived were ones that had been accidentally fired — when the city burned down, frequently at the hands of hostile invaders.   Of course, sometimes fires would start by accident, but some of the richest archeological sites for fired clay tablets are from cities that lost big fights badly.

Links: Wikipedia, Ancient Scripts, Omniglot

Posted in Alphabet, Rating: 5 "Whoa!!", Syllabaries | 2 Comments

Lycian — 600 BC?, Turkey

Lycian nasalized "e"

The Lycians lived in southwest Turkey, not far from Greece, but spoke a descendant of Luwian.   They made a new alphabet by adding a few characters to the Dorian dialect of the Greek  alphabet.  Some of the letters might have been pulled from the neighbouring Carian script.

The glyphs that they used are not hugely interesting, but what the Lycians put between the glyphs was: as near as I can tell, Lycian was the first script to ever put spaces between words.

Other writing systems had tried other word separators — vertical bars particularly were popular — but in my opinion those are not as useful.  Some reading researchers believe that the Bouma shape — essentially the outline of a word — is useful in word recognition.  Thus your eye might recognize a word that has tall-letter, short-letter, tall, tall, short as the word “little” even without looking carefully at each letter.  It is easier to see the shape of the word if there is space delimiting it instead of a similar-looking symbol.

It is very hard to read scripto continuo, text without separation.  It is telling that there is a moment in St. Augustine’s Confessions where Augustine recounts his astonishment at discovering St. Ambrose reading silently, without even moving his lips.  Augustine took this ability as a mark of unusual genius.

We might laugh at the thought that reading liplessly is unusual, but try reading somethingthatisallsmooshedtogetherwithoutanypunctuationata llitisdifficultyoumightstartmovingyourlipstoo.

UPDATE/COMMENT: I hear that the above paragraph doesn’t render well at some point sizes.  Sorry, but I can’t really fix it with WordPress.  If I remove the space in the middle of the last sentence, it becomes all one line, with no wrapping, which can run into the right column.

One thing that I have been intrigued by as I have learned about writing systems is how significantly technology affects the writing system; I am amused that the technology I use to write this blog prevents me from displaying Latin script in the form that Latin script started out in!

Links: Wikipedia, Ancient Scripts, Omniglot

Posted in Alphabet, Rating: 4 "Huh, interesting!" | 1 Comment

Carian — 650 BC?, Turkey

Unknown Carian letter

There are a fair number of texts in Carian in both southwestern Turkey and in Egypt, but archeologists had a devil of a time figuring out what they said.  This was a bit odd, as the Carians used a variant of the Greek alphabet and, from what the archaeolinguists knew from non-Carian sources, the language wasn’t that unusual.  Carian did have a bunch of additional symbols, but that wasn’t the biggest problem.

It wasn’t until the 1980s that John D. Ray finally cracked the code.  His insight was that the Carian alphabet did not use the same pronunciation as the Greek alphabet!  For example, a triangle was “l” and not “d” as in Greek.  Gamma was “th” and not “g”.

Once they let go of the idea that the Carian glyphs had to be pronounced like the Greek letters, it was relatively straightforward to see Carian as a close descendent of Luwian.  The presence of inscriptions in Egypt turns out to be due to a mobile labour force: Carians served as mercenaries for Egyptian rulers.

The Carians must have either forgotten about Luwian hieroglyphics or gotten bored with them.

Links: Wikipedia, Ancient Scripts

Posted in Alphabet, Rating: 4 "Huh, interesting!" | 1 Comment

Latin Majuscule — 690 BC, Italy

Latin "a"

Latin script and its variants are the most widely used writing systems in the world.  Latin script is the primary writing system in most of Europe, almost all of North America, South America, Australia, and Antarctica, large portions of Africa, and a significant part of Asia.  It has significant auxiliary use in Asia, e.g. as a second language and showing pronunciation for Chinese.

There is a Roman legend that the goddess Carmenta modified the Greek script to make the Latin script, but scholars believe that Latin script came from Etruscan script.  Like Etruscan of the time, Latin was originally written right-to-left, but Latin eventually shifted to left-to-right.  Latin jettisoned several Etruscan letters that were not needed, corresponding to the “ph”, “th”, and “kh”, and an “s” sound (roughly the Greek phi, theta, chi, and one not found in the modern Greek alphabet).

According to some Roman sources, Spurius Carvilius Ruga invented the “G” symbol to distinguish the “k” sound from the “g” sound, both of which had been written with a “C” (descended from the Greek “gamma”).  He jettisoned the “z” (which was only used to write Greek loanwords), and put “G” in its place.

Later, after the Romans conquered Greece, they decided they writing Greek words was important after all.  They grabbed the “Z” again; they also snagged the Greek “Y” (which in the variant the Etruscans had grabbed was shaped like a “V” and ended up being pronounced as “u”).  The Romans stuck the “Y” and “Z” at the end of the alphabet (which is an extremely common place to put new letters).

Note that while Americans pronounce the letter “Z” as “zee”, almost all other English speakers (including Canadians) pronounce it as “zed” — like the Greek “zeta”.

The alert reader will note that I used capital letters (also called majuscule) for all the Latin script letters here, and that there is no mention of “W”, “J”, and “U”, which are not in the Greek alphabet.  These are not typos. Early Latin only had what we think of as upper case letters, no spaces between words, and the “W”, “J”, and”U” did not exist in Latin at first.  There was no “w” sound in Latin, “I” was also used for the “j” sound, and “V” was also used for “u”.

Early Latin did used vertically centered dots called interpuncts to separate words, but this went out of fashion even before the Romans did.

Note: I put that Latin Majescule originated in 690 BC, but really, we don’t know that precisely.  We know that Etruscan and Latin both were around in the vicinity of 700 BC, and we know that Etruscan came first, but we don’t know exactly what date the first Etruscan words were written nor how long after that the first Latin words were written.  It might have been six months between the two, it might have been fifty years.

Links: Wikipedia, Ancient Scripts, Omniglot

Posted in Alphabet, Rating: 4 "Huh, interesting!" | 8 Comments

Etruscan — Italy, 700 BC

Etruscan "b"

Somewhat unusually, the Etruscan writing system is completely understood, but the Etruscan language is not.  With the early Cypriot script, archeological linguists can guess that the symbols in early Cypriot writing system corresponded to the same pronunciation and orthography as they did when later used write a dialect of Greek (which is deciphered), but there is no assurance of that.  With Etruscan, they are certain of the writing system.  Not only do they have a small number of bilingual texts, but they understand very well both the alphabet it came from and an alphabet that came from it.

The Etruscan alphabet came from the version of the Greek alphabet used on the western Greek island Euboea and was shortly afterwards adapted by the Romans to become the Latin script.  Note that the Euboean Greek alphabet did not have omega, but used a character for the “s” sound that looked more like an “s” than a sigma.  They later started using a glyph that looks like a modern “8” for the “f” sound, but only after the Romans adopted their alphabet.

The Etruscans got the alphabet from the Greeks early enough that the Greeks had not yet settled on which direction they would write.  Etruscan, like Phoenecian, was written right-to-left most of the time.  Many Etruscan letters “look reversed” to Latin-script readers for that reason.  Occasionally, Etruscans would write boustrophedonically.

Part of why Etruscan hasn’t been deciphered is that it (again!) appears to be a language isolate, and there weren’t that many textual examples.  Worse, many of the examples of Etruscan texts are on tombstones — not the most auspicious place to find bilingual texts or dictionaries.

Links: Ancient Scripts, Omniglot, Wikipedia

Posted in Alphabet, language unknown, Rating: 3 "I did not know that" | 3 Comments

Zero — various times, various places

When I was a little girl, I thought the concept of zero had always been with humans, sort of like food and pain and sky.  When I got a bit older, I learned that zero had been discovered/invented rather recently in recorded history.  The truth, as it often is, is a bit more complicated than that.

Zero has two uses: as a positional place-holder in place-value systems, and as a number.

The Hindu-Arabic numeral system with a “0” for both meanings came to Europe in around 1200 AD via the Persian mathematician and polymath Al-Khwarizmi (for whom “algorithm” is named) who described them in 825 AD.  He might have built on work on place-value systems, which were described as early as 458 AD in India which wrote out the words for numerals.  The first known, dated, unambiguous use of a glyph for 0 in India was on an inscription dated 876 AD.

Base-ten arithmetic and symbols for zeros had been scattered around for quite some time before then.

As early as 1800 BC, the Babylonians were doing complex math with a base-sixty system.  (Their base-60 system lives on in how we count time and degrees in a circle.)  At first, they left a space for place-values where we would put a 0, but by 700 BC, they were using special glyphs for placeholder in the middle of numbers (but not at the end!).  They did not, however, use the 0 by itself to show a quantity of nothing.

Indians might have been using dots for a true zero as early as 30 BC, but the dating of that document is questioned.

Many other civilizations used a space for zero, including Incan (on quipu), India around 300 BC, and China around 300 BC.  The Mayans, as early as 36 BC, used special symbols to denote zero in their base-20 counting system, but not for a number.

In 130 AD, Ptolemy used a circle with a bar over it as a true zero, but only for positions after the decimal place, not for the integer part of numbers.

Links: Wikipedia

Posted in Numbers, Rating: 5 "Whoa!!" | Leave a comment

Greek — 800 BC, Greece

Ancient Greek "th" (theta)

Greek legend says that a Phoenician, Cadmus, brought writing to the Greeks.  This is not hard to believe, as the earliest Greek glyphs look very similar to Phoenician.  However, the Greek alphabet had something from the beginning that no other writing system had: full independent vowels.  Having a full set glyphs for vowels and a full set of glyphs for consonants made Greek an alphabet instead of abjad or syllabary.    All other alphabets derive from the Greek; there are no cases of people independently developing an alphabet (with the possible exception of Elder Futhark or Ogham, though I think that is unlikely).

There have been some syllabaries since that have vowels and syllables (e.g. Japanese), and some writing systems that decorate the consonant to indicate the vowel, but none where consonants and vowels are all there and independent units, except for those that derive from Greek.

It’s not that everyone before the Greeks was stupid: alphabetic writing systems can require many more glyphs to say the same thing than a logographic language, syllabary, or abjad.  This is not a virtue when writing technology is either expensive (like papyrus) or awkward (like clay tablets).

Partly, Greeks established complete vowels because they had no choice: the language would be unintelligible without them.  In Semitic languages, the vowels are not hugely important.  Two different words with the same consonants are almost always related, like “swam” and “swum”: both have to do with splashing around in the water.  In Indo-European languages like Greek, vowels are really important.  “Drown” and “drawn” refer to radically different concepts!

Originally, Greek was written right-to-left (like Phoenician), then boustrophedon, but after a while they settled on left-to-right.  Because Greece had such significant linguistic separation (due to being a bunch of islands), there were significant dialectical differences in both written and spoken Greek.  They didn’t settle on a standard alphabet until around 400 BC, when Athens standardized on the Ionian script.

While the Phoenicians spread their writing system along the southern part of the Mediterranean, the Greeks spread it along the northern part, most importantly to Italy.

Links: Wikipedia, Ancient Scripts, Omniglot

Posted in Alphabet, previous script didn't quite work, Rating: 5 "Whoa!!" | 9 Comments